Tag: birth rates

  • Introduction to Demographics and Global Population Projections

    Photo by Ahmad Shakir Shamsulbadri on Pexels.com

     

     OVERVIEW


    Much of this is taken from the summary of the longer and more detailed

    Global Demographics and Population Projections



    This is a summary and overview of the demographics and population projection essays on this blog (links below). The world is at the beginning of a major shift in population, from large population increases since 1950 to decreasing populations in many countries and, in the long run, in the world as a whole. This historical shift in global and national populations will have a big influence on what happens in the future.

     

    In summary,

    ·      Huge population increases since 1900, especially after 1950.

    ·      Because of a big decrease in birth rates, global population will increase until the 2060s and then start to decrease.

    ·      Some countries are already seeing a population decrease. More will follow in the near future, including the United States. Yearly population decreases will grow larger. At the same time, working-age populations will grow smaller while over-65 population will grow larger.

    ·     These trends will have a big effect on all other changes – economic, political, environmental. 

    Think of the world as divided into Africa and Not-Africa (rest of the world). Between now and sometime in the 2060s, the increase in population in Africa will be greater than the decrease in population in Not-Africa. From the 2060s to 2100, the decrease in population in Not-Africa will be greater than the slowing increase in population in Africa.

     

    DEFINITIONS AND BIRTH RATE PROJECTIONS

    Demographics is the study of populations and how a population breaks down by age, gender, race, and other variables.

     

    There is one concept that is crucial for population projections:

    Total Fertility Ratio (TFR). This is the ratio of the average number of children of women in child-bearing ages. For a population to be stable, women must have an average of 2.1 children each. Any smaller number means the population is “below replacement” and may decrease in the future.

     

    The global birth rate (total fertility rate) is now about 2.3, slightly above the replacement rate of 2.1, and falling. How fast it falls depends critically on how fast it falls in India and in Africa.

     

    The global Total Fertility Ratio (TFR) is forecasted to be 1.7 in 2100, well below replacement. Currently, the lowest birth rates in the world, at around 1.0, are in East Asia – China, Japan, and South Korea. Europe as a whole has birth rates almost as low.

     

    A population may have below replacement birth rates and for some time also have expanding population if in the past it had above replacement birth rates, a large percent of its population were children and young adults, and the adult population is experiencing rising life expectancies. Or, the decrease in population is offset by immigration.

     

    Total populations eventually fall, as the number of children fall, the number of adults below 65 fall, and then the number of senior citizens fall.  A birth rate below replacement will lead to fewer children. Then it will lead to a smaller working-age population (18-65). And finally, a smaller over-65 population.

     

    GLOBAL POPULATION IN THE PAST

    Since the beginning of the Agricultural Revolution (farming and domesticating animals) about 10,000 years ago, demographics meant high birth rates, high infant mortality rates, low life expectancies, and high death rates. The world’s population didn’t change very much until the Industrial Revolution, starting in the late 1700s. Death rates fell faster than birth rates; better health and health care reduced infant mortality rates.

    At the same time, much of the world’s population experienced rising standards of living. Better public health reached poorer parts of the world. Urbanization, which lowers birth rates, greatly expanded. Better education, especially of females, is correlated to falls in birth rates. One consequence was longer life expectancies and rising average ages in industrialized countries and then in poorer countries. The age composition of the global population changed, as the average age of the populations in most countries started rising.

    During this transition period, from the late 1800s to the present, average life expectancies increased from roughly 30 years to 75-80 years in industrializing countries.

    Global population:

    1900 – Approximately 1.6 billion people

    After World War II, the global population exploded:

    1950 – 2.6 billion

    2024 – 8.0 billion (November, 2023)

    The global population has more than doubled since 1970, going from 3.7 billion people to the current (November, 2023) total of 8.0 billion (UN numbers).

    The period from 1950 to 2000 was unusual. Not just in the United States, the global population experienced high birthrates and high population growth rates. In the middle of this period, partly due to more effective and more available birth control, birth rates began declining in the industrialized countries. The growth rate of the world population began to slow.

    POPULATION PROJECTIONS

    The global population is projected to be:

    2064 – 9.7 billion (the peak global population)

    2100 – 8.8 billion

    By the 2060s, the global birth rate will be below replacement. Over the next 40 years (2025-2065), the world’s population will rise by about 1.7 billion and then over the 35 years after that, decline by approximately 0.9 billion (900 million). By 2100, the global population will have fallen to 8.8 billion.

    By 2050, 151 countries (out of 192) are forecasted to have a birth rate lower than the replacement rate (<2.1). 23 countries are forecasted to have population declines greater than 50% by 2100. China’s population is forecasted to decline by 48%, from the current 1.4 billion to about 750 million in 2100.

    Compared to the present, Africa is expected to have about 2.2 billion more people in 2100. The rest of the world is expected to see a decrease of about 1.4 billion people. One billion of the decrease will occur in China (about 750-800) and India (about 250-300). The rest of the decrease will occur mostly in Europe, southeast and southern Asia, and Japan. The US may be at the beginning of the downward population curve if the recent trends of a below (and falling) replacement birth rate and the current decrease in net immigration continue. 

    About 500 million of the African increase will happen in Nigeria. (See essay in this blog on Nigeria) Nigeria’s population growth will be so great that by 2100 the country may pass or equal China as the second most populous country in the world.

    The global population is aging, with the over-65 age group becoming a larger percent of the total. By 2100, there will be 2.4 billion individuals older than 65 years compared to 1.7 billion individuals younger than 20 years.  

    The industrialized and modernizing parts of the world now have low birth rates – mostly below replacement – and low death rates. Birth rates are also falling in much of the rest of the world. 

    Declining population is already true in Japan, China and Russia, and is about to be true for most of Europe and much of Southeast Asia.

    As the population and the labor force of a country decrease, it is possible that income per capita will continue to rise for a generation or two. But in the long run, income per capita will probably fall.

    It is nearly impossible to predict technological and organizational change over the next 25 or 50 years. This will help determine if increases in productivity will counter the decrease in the size of the working population. This raises questions about the role robots in manufacturing and distribution (Amazon warehouses) and AI models in offices will play in the future. Robots are used more in countries with a declining number of employees now or in the near future (Japan, South Korea, and China).

    GLOBAL DEMOGRAPHICS

    Outside of Africa, the global birth rate is already below replacement but longer life expectancies will lead to continued population growth for one or two generations. Many countries already have or are about to have declining populations.

    Countries with over a third of the world’s population and most of the world’s output now have birth rates below or at replacement. They are mostly the wealthy, industrialized countries, including the United States, Canada, Brazil, Western and Central Europe, Turkey, parts of Southeast Asia, Japan, Russia, and China. Collectively, the size of their workforces has stopped growing. India, the exception, has a birth rate that just fell to replacement and will probably continue to fall. This will add another 17% of the world’s population that has a below replacement birth rate.
     
    There are falling birth rates for most of the rest of the world’s population, coming down from very high levels. But total population continues to grow, partly because of lower infant and child mortality rates, public health programs, better medicine, and longer lives in most of the world.

    Regardless of what happens to the size of the labor forces in individual countries, the size of the global labor force after around 2100 will start to fall. An important question may be how it is allocated by migration.

    GLOBAL FORECASTS 

    We are now in a period of a slowdown in total population growth rates. Global population is growing at about one percent per year and the rate continues to fall. But the increase in the number of people is large. 

    Changes in total population may be points on an exponential decay curve. The decline in numbers after achieving the maximum number of people in the 2060s will depend on how fast the African birth rate falls. Countries with birthrates well below replacement and aging populations may experience accelerating decreases in population. 

    The rate of decline could change with changes in the availability and cost of birth control, anti-aging medical technologies and more available health care for an aging population.

    A big unknown is future medical technology that prolongs life expectancies. Technological advances might also decrease medical costs per capita. Regardless of the projections, the fastest growing age cohort in the foreseeable future is 80 years and older.

    Countries with birthrates well below replacement and aging populations may experience accelerating decreases in population.

    POOR COUNTRIES AND RICH COUNTRIES

    Wealthy countries have below replacement birth rates, no growth or declining populations and labor forces, low real economic growth, and aging populations and labor forces. Population will continue to concentrate in cities; the population of a small number of cities will be responsible for technological innovation and economic development. Rural areas will continue to lose population.

    Africa and a few poor countries outside of Africa will have the opposite problem. They will have above replacement birth rates for a generation or two. This will lead to high growth rates in labor force age groups and total population. Whether or not this will translate into high economic growth rates is problematic, depending on many other factors. These countries could be a source of large immigration to richer countries.

    Many poor countries have poor infrastructure, poor education and health facilities, diseases, parasitic and corrupt political elites and bureaucracies, military coups, and internal violence including civil wars for political control. As an example, the next essay I will send you is a quick look at Nigeria.

    All countries will sooner or later face the same challenges:  With declining populations and smaller labor forces, will they be able to invest in economic growth and development (innovation and structural change), deal with environmental costs and climate change, and support aging populations?

     

    (DISCLAIMER:  MY LAWYER FORCED ME TO ADD THIS)

    The posts on demographics contain long-term forecasts. They give the best estimates, given the assumptions. All contain large ranges of uncertainty (standard deviations or uncertainty interval), which is one reason to learn about statistics. Generally, the further out the forecast, the larger the uncertainty interval. It is impossible to forecast major changes in health care and AI technology, immigration laws, and other variables that could change the exponential trends.

    ==================================================

    For more on future demographics and how population trends might interact with economic variables, see


    Global Demographics and Population Projections


    Demographics and Economic Growth


    Demographics, Immigration and Future Economic Growth of the United States

    Demographics and Population Projections of Japan


    For how the expected demographic trends might influence future United States government finances and deficits, see


    Government Finance 101. Fiscal Policy:  Welcome to Alice in Wonderland

  • Global Demographics and Population Projections

    Global Demographics and Population Projections

     

    City Life for Most Residents

    Before reading this essay and related essays on demographics and population projections, you might want to start with an introduction:


    Introduction to Demographics and Global Population Projections

     SUMMARY

    Global population has more than doubled since 1970, going from 3.7 billion to the current (November, 2023) total of 8.0 billion (UN numbers). The Lancet long-term projection is that world population will peak around 9.7 billion in the 2060s and then begin to decline, reaching around 8.8 billion people in 2100.

     

    In the most recent United Nations projection (2024), global population is expected to peak at about 10.3 billion sometime in the 2080s and then fall to 10.2 billion in 2100.

    By 2030, 1.4 billion people will be over the age of 60, with low- and middle-income countries accounting for 80% of older populations. About 25% of the total will be in China. This number is equal to China’s or India’s total population.

     

    Compared to the present, Africa is expected to have about 2.2 billion

    more people in 2100. The rest of the world is expected to see a decrease

    of about 1.4 billion people. One billion of the decrease will occur in

    China and India. The rest of the decrease will occur mostly in Europe,

    southeast and southern Asia, and Japan. The United States and Latin

    America (because of increasing population in Mexico) will see little

    change. But due to recent changes in net immigration, the United States will probably see zero population growth by about 2031 (recent CBO projection) and then slowly decreasing population.

     

    Nigeria’s population growth will be so great that the country will pass China by 2100 as the second most populous country in the world.

    China has reached zero population growth. Between now and 2050, 43% of the world’s population increase will be accounted for by only five countries – India, Nigeria, Congo, Ethiopia, and Pakistan. India’s population is expected to peak in the 2060s and then gradually decline.

    Europe has the oldest average (median) age. Its population began shrinking in 2020. In 2050, its population will be about 40 million people less.

     

    The following is the summary in the Lancet study.

     

    The global population is projected to peak in 2064 at 9·7 billion people and decline to 8·8 billion in 2100. Findings also suggest a shifting age structure in many parts of the world, with 2·4 billion individuals older than 65 years and 1·7 billion individuals younger than 20 years globally in 2100. By 2050, 151 countries (out of 200) were forecasted to have a TFR lower than the replacement level (TFR <2·1), and 183 were forecasted to have a TFR lower than replacement by 2100. 23 countries, including Japan, Thailand, and Spain, were forecasted to have population declines greater than 50% from 2017 to 2100; China’s population was forecasted to decline by 48·0% to around 750 million.

     

    DEFINITIONS AND BIRTH RATE PROJECTIONS

     

    Demographics is the study of populations and how a population breaks down by age, gender, race and other variables. In this post, I will concentrate on trends and forecasts of the future population of the entire world and by regions and countries. Other posts concentrate on Japan and the United States in greater depth. 

     

    There are two concepts that are crucial to population projections:

     

    Total Fertility Ratio (TFR). This is the ratio of the average number of children of women in child-bearing ages. For a population to be stable, women must have an average of 2.1 children each. Any smaller number means the population is “below replacement” and may decrease in the future.

     

    The global birth rate (total fertility rate) is now about 2.3, slightly above the replacement rate of 2.1, and falling.

     

    The global Total Fertility Ratio (TFR) in the Lancet study is forecasted to be 1.7 in 2100. By 2050, 151 countries were forecasted to have a TFR lower than the replacement level and 183 countries (out of approximately 193 countries) were forecasted to have a TFR lower than replacement by 2100.

     

    A country may have below replacement birth rates and for some time also have expanding population if in the past it had above replacement birth rates, a large percent of its population were children and young adults, and the adult population is experiencing rising life expectancies. Or, the decrease in population is offset by immigration.

    For Europe, the birth rate went below replacement in the 1970s and population stopped growing in 2020. For China, an extremely low birth rate started in the 1990s (one child policy), never recovered even when the policy was abandoned. China’s population probably peaked in 2023.


    Dependency Ratio. This is the ratio of the age categories (usually children plus over 65) to the working-age population. In aging societies, it is often the ratio of 65 and older to the working-age population.

     

    MAIN SOURCES OF POPULATION PROJECTIONS

     

    Until 2020, the standard source of long-run population projections was United Nations Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs, “World Population Prospects 2024.”

    Population.UN.org

     

    A new set of projections was published in Lancet in 2020:

     

    Stein Emil Vollset, et al, “ Fertility, mortality, migration, and population scenarios for 195 countries and territories from 2017 to 2100: a forecasting analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study,” Lancet, 2020, VOlume 396, ISSUE 10258, 1285–306. 

     

    Published Online July 14, 2020 https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0140-6736(20)30677-2

     

    It seems to me that the methodology use by the Lancet study is preferable to the United Nations study. Lancet authors’ explanation of their methodology is quoted in the appendix.

    The Lancet projections, based on trends into the 2010s, may be too high.

     

    INTRODUCTION

     

    The posts on demographics contain long-term forecasts. They give the best estimates, given the assumptions. All contain large ranges of uncertainty (standard deviations or uncertainty interval). Generally, the further out the forecast, the larger the uncertainty interval. It is impossible to forecast major changes in health care technology, immigration laws and other variables that could change the exponential trends. 

    With low birth rates in many parts of the world, an “exogenous” (outside) event like Covid or the war in Ukraine can affect intermediate (2050) or long term (2100) projections for an individual country, region, or the entire world.

     

    Over the last few years, there has been major changes in global demographic forecasts. Generally, they have forecasted slower rates of growth, earlier dates for maximum population (2060s), and shrinking population from maximum population to the year 2100.

     

    GLOBAL POPULATION

     

    Since the beginning of the Agricultural Revolution about 10,000 years ago, demographics meant high birth rates, high infant mortality rates, low life expectancies, and high death rates. Until the Industrial Revolution, starting in the late 1700s. Death rates fell faster than birth rates; better health and health care reduced infant mortality rates.

     

    At the same time, much of the world’s population experienced rising standards of living. Better public health reached poorer parts of the world. Urbanization, which lowers birth rate, greatly expanded. Better education, especially for females, is correlated with falling birth rates. One consequence was longer life expectancies and rising average ages in industrialized countries and then in poorer countries. The age composition of the global population changed, as the average age of the populations in most countries started rising.

     

    During this transition period, from the late 1800s to the present, average life expectancies increased from roughly 30 years to 75-80 years in industrializing countries. 

     

    After World War II, the global population exploded:

     

    1900 – Approximately 1.6 billion people

    1950 – 2.6 billion

    2000 – 6.1 billion

    2020 – 7.7 billion

    2024 – 8.0 billion (November, 2023)

    This spectacular increase in population, combined with equally spectacular increases in energy-intensive production and consumption, has contributed to the current global warming crisis. This is more amazing because the earth was in a long-term, gradual cooling cycle. For an excellent book that explains the science and history behind long-term climate cycles, see Peter Brannen, The Story of CO2 is the Story of Everything:  How Carbon Dioxide Made Our World, 2025,

     

    Again, the Lancet global population projections are: 

     

    2064 – 9.7 billion (the peak global population)

    2100 – 8.8 billion

     

    The period from 1950 to 2000 was unusual. Not just in the United States, the global population experienced high birthrates and high population growth rates. In the middle of this period, partly due to more effective and more available birth control, birth rates began a rapid decline in the industrialized countries. The growth rate of the world population began to slow.

     

    The industrialized and modernizing parts of the world now have low birth rates – mostly below replacement – and low death rates. Birth rates are also falling in much of the rest of the world. One factor that is seldom discussed is that birth rates continue to fall in countries that are already at below replacement. One example is the United States.

     

    Declining population is already true in Japan, China and Russia, and parts of central and eastern Europe and much of East Asia (including Japan, Taiwan, and South Korea). European countries will see 30-50% decreases in the long run.

     

    It is important to remember, but seldom discussed, that a projection of declining population or shrinking labor force to 2050 or 2100 does not mean that the decreases stop in those years. These are points on an exponentially declining curve. Decreases in total population eventually fall, as the number of children declines, the number of adults below 65 years of age fall, and then the number of senior citizens fall. 

     

    This assumes no technological or attitudinal changes leading to higher number of births, that a higher percent of heathier seniors will not work longer or retire later, that projections of longer life expectancies are not dramatically higher. Also, no speculation about the future possibility of massive migration, the long-term effects of global warming and climate change, or changes in retirement ages, laws, and programs. No speculation on when the research and innovation in health care technology will become widespread.

     

    As populations and the labor forces of a country decrease, it is possible that income per capita will continue to rise for a generation or two. But in the long run, income per capita will probably fall. 

    Some of the more speculative projections are that a world of robots and AI may replace some or much of the future declining labor force and increase productivity. If so, it may be that a shrinking, aging population may also have a rising standard of living. But it is nearly impossible to predict technological and organizational change over the next 25 or 50 years. 

    GLOBAL DEMOGRAPHICS

    Outside of Africa, the global birth rate is already below replacement but longer life expectancies will lead to continued population growth for one or two generations. About 43 countries already have declining populations.

    Countries with over a third of the world’s population and most of the world’s output now have birth rates below or at replacement. They are mostly the wealthy, industrialized countries, including the United States, Canada, Brazil, Western and Central Europe, Turkey, parts of Southeast Asia, Japan, Russia and China. Collectively, the size of their labor forces has stopped growing. India has a falling birth rate that just fell below replacement. This will add another 17% of the world’s population that has a below replacement birth rate.
     
    There are falling birth rates for most of the rest of the world’s population, coming down from very high levels. But total population continues to grow, partly because of lower infant and child mortality rates, public health programs, better medicine, and longer lives in most of the world. 


    Barring catastrophe or economic collapse from increasing population, Africa will probably not reach zero population growth until some time around 2100. Possibly sooner if birth rates fall faster than currently forecasted.

     

    Regardless of what happens to the size of the labor forces in individual countries, the size of the global labor force after around 2100 will start to fall. A global question may be how it is allocated.  

     

    All countries will face the same challenges:  With declining populations and smaller labor forces, will they be able to invest in economic growth and development (innovation and structural change), deal with environmental costs and climate change, and support aging populations?

     

    GLOBAL FORECASTS

     

    The following are forecasts in the Lancet long-run projection. First, a summary of the global forecast.

     

    Region

    2017

    Population in billions

    Projected 2100

    Population in billions

    2017

    Birth Rate

    Projected 2100

    Birth Rate

    Global

    7.64

    8.79

    2.37

    1.66

     

    The total global population in 2024 is around 8 billion. A maximum global population of around 9.7 billion is expected to occur around 2064. The global birth rate will be below replacement. So over the next 40 years (2025-2065), the world’s population will rise by about 1.7 billion and then over the 35 years after that, decline by approximately 0.9 billion (900 million). By 2100, the global population will have fallen to 8.8 billion. 

     

    We are now in a period of a slowdown in total population growth rates. Global population is growing at about one percent per year and the rate continues to fall. But the increase in the number of people is large, about 80 million people a year. 

     

    Changes in total population may be points on an exponential decay curve. The decline in numbers after achieving the maximum in the 2060s may be slow for a few years and then accelerate. The timing will depend on how fast the African birth rate falls. 

     

    The rate of decline could change with changes in the availability and cost of birth control, anti-aging medical technologies, and more available health care for an aging population.

     

    The biggest unknown is future medical technology that will prolong life expectancies. Technological advances might also decrease medical costs per capita. Regardless of the projection, the fastest growing age cohort in the foreseeable future is 80 years and older.

     

    Countries with birthrates well below replacement and aging populations will experience accelerating decreases in population.

     

    POOR COUNTRIES AND RICH COUNTRIES

     

    Wealthy countries have below replacement birth rates, no growth or declining populations and labor forces, low real economic growth and aging populations and labor forces. Population will continue to concentrate in cities; the population of a small number of cities will be responsible for technological innovation and economic development. Rural areas will continue to lose population.

     

    Africa and a few poor countries outside of Africa will have the opposite problem. They will have above replacement birth rates for a generation or two. This will lead to high growth rates in labor force age groups and total population. Whether or not this will translate into high economic growth rates is problematic, depending on many other factors. These countries could be a source of large immigration to richer countries.

     

    Poor countries typically have poor infrastructure, poor education and health facilities, diseases and epidemics, parasitic and corrupt political elites and bureaucracies, military coups, and internal violence including civil wars for political control.

     

    INTERREGIONAL CHANGE

     

    The global figures hide big regional differences. About half of the world’s projected population growth between 2022 and 2050 is expected to occur in eight countries, five in Africa (Congo, Egypt, Ethiopia, Nigeria and Tanzania) and three in Asia (India, Pakistan and the Philippines). Africa recently passed the combined populations of the United States and Europe. In 1980, Africa’s population was one-third that of the U.S. and Europe.

     

    Most of the largest and fastest growing urban areas in the world are in populous poor countries, including Indonesia, Pakistan, Nigeria and India. Over half of the world’s population live in cities and the percent is rising. Almost all of the increased population in poor countries will live in or move to cities, which are already ecological disasters – traffic gridlock, poor air quality, lack of adequate infrastructure, sinking, raw sewage, and power outages. Many are coastal cities that are already experiencing periodic flooding and storm surges; rising sea levels and the increased number and severity of hurricanes will intensify urban problems.  (See the example of Niger in The Economist (July 1, 2023, 15) for the human side behind the statistics. Niger has one of the highest birth rates in the world.)

     

    Starting sometime in the 2060s, the world’s declining population outside of Africa will equal Africa’s population growth. Africa’s population is expected to grow from about 2.7 billion in the 2060s to about 3.5 billion in 2100. The rest of the world will see population fall from about 7.0 billion in the 2060s to 5.3 billion in 2100, or 1.7 billion. Of this total, about one billion of the decrease will occur in China and India.

     

    The forecast is that the world’s birth rate in 2100 will be below replacement, at 1.66. How soon the world reaches zero population growth will depend critically on when the world’s birth rate falls below replacement, which in turn depends on how fast birth rates decline in Africa.

     

    By 2100, Africa could have about as many people as Asia, about 3.5 billion. Together, Africa and Asia in 2100 could have about 80% of the world’s population. Europe and the United States together will have about 10% of the world’s population. Globally, this will be a world with substantially more people over the age of 65 than under 20 – 2.4 billion vs. 1.7 billion.

     

    There will be significantly different population patterns by region and by country. Many countries in Africa will double or triple in population. Many countries outside of Africa will have a lower population. Some countries, 23 in all, including China, Japan, South Korea, Thailand, Spain and Bulgaria will see their populations cut in half by 2100. 

     

    The remaining populations outside of Africa will also be older. Countries with large population decreases mean old populations, with a high percent of over-65 and a low percent of children. Africa will have the “youngest” regional population, which is one reason that the region’s population can continue to grow even as birth rates fall below replacement.

     

    THE DEMOGRAPHICS OF SPECIFIC REGIONS AND COUNTRIES

     

    The Lancet projections for the six most populous countries in 2100 are India (1·09 billion), Nigeria (791 million), China (750 million), the United States (336 million), and Pakistan (248 million). The projections are probably too high for India and the United States if the birth rate in India continues to fall and the current (2025) immigration and deportation policies of the United States continue.

     

     

    SUMMARY OF REGIONAL PROJECTIONS

     

    Region

    2017

    Population

    Projected 2100

    Population

    2017

    Birth Rate

    Projected 2100

    Birth Rate

    Africa

    1,227

    3,504

    4.62

    1.73

    Central Europe

       115

         52

    1.43

    1.35

    Eastern Europe (Includes Russia)

       210

       135

    1.55

    1.45

    High Income East Asia

       187

         94

    1.30

    1.33

    North America

       361

       380

    1.79

    1.54

    Western Europe

       433

       375

    1.59

    1.64

    Latin America

       582

       575

    2.18

    1.58

    South Asia

    1,783

    1,440

    2.27

    1.33

    Southeast & East Asia

    2,159

    1,435

    1.72

    1.61

    Lancet

     

    By the end of the century, every region and almost every country will have a birth rate below replacement.

     

    By 2100, Africa could have about as many people as in Asia, about 3.5 billion. Together, Africa and Asia in 2100 could have about 80% of the world’s population. The United States plus all of Europe (including Russia) might have about 10% of the world’s population.

     

     

    AFRICA

     

    Year

    Millions

    % Increase

    Millions

    Increase

     

    1960

       284

    29%

     

     

    1970

       366

    29%

      82

     

    1980

       483

    32%

    117

     

    1990

       644

    33%

    161

     

    2000

       831

    29%

    187

     

    2010

    1,072

    29%

    241

     

    2020

    1,381

    29%

    309

     

     

    In 2024, Africa’s population was estimated to be 1,515 million (1½ billion). (UN numbers) Current UN projection is that Africa’s population will increase to about 2.5 billion by 2050 and 3.5 billion in 2100. 

     

    Region

    2017

    Population

    Projected 2100

    Population

    2017

    Birth Rate

    Projected 2100

    Birth Rate

     

    Sub-Sahara

    1,026

    3,071

    4.62

    1.73

     

    North Africa

       201

       433

     

     

     

    Africa Total

    1,227

    3,504

     

     

     

    Lancet projections

     

    Between 2010 and 2020, in just 10 years, the African population increased about the same amount as the total population of the United States. The increase in African population in this decade (2020-2030) will probably be greater, despite the impact of Covid. Better vaccines and control methods of malaria, Africa’s health scourge, are being perfected and produced.

     

    Africa is the poorest region in the world. Africa’s population is expected to triple between 2017 and 2100. By the end of the century, Africa will have 40-45% of the world’s population.  

     

    Sub-Saharan Africa’s 2024 birth rate is about 4.3 – 4.4 children per woman past child-bearing ages, by far the highest regional birth rate in the world. This number is expected to fall to about 1.7 in 2100. North Africa’s collective birth rate, dominated by Egypt, might be near replacement.

     

    It will still be the highest regional birth rate in the world. Although below replacement, Africa’s population will still be increasing at the end of the century but may be close to its maximum. 

     

    Family planning, combined with urbanization and more education of females, could lead to birth rates declining faster than projected in high birth-rate countries. In Africa, Ethiopia, Malawi and Rwanda promoted family planning and have seen large decreases in their birth rates. Kenya, after investing in family planning clinics and information, has seen its fertility rate fall from 6.5 in the late 1980s to 2.4, marginally above replacement and half the rate of most African countries.

     

    This is a good example of exponential growth. Although the growth rate remains about constant, around 30% per decade (2.4% per year), the 10-year increase in population gets larger as the base increases over time.

     

    The working age population in sub-Saharan Africa will increase by about 700 million (!) by 2050. This will be roughly equal to the current working-age population of China or India. Although Africa will have a large increase in population, its young population will lead to a small percent increase in senior citizens.

     

    Projected populations for the most populous countries are:

     

    Most Populous Countries

    2017

    Population

    Projected 2100

    Population

    2017

    Birth Rate

    Projected 2100

    Birth Rate

     

    Nigeria

    206

    790

    5.11

    1.69

     

    Ethiopia

    103

    225

    4.79

    1.33

     

    Egypt

      96

    200

    2.66

    2.08

     

    Congo (DRC)

      81

    245

    5.05

    1.75

     

    Tanzania

      54

    185

    4.79

    1.60

     

    Lancet projections

     

    I find the population number for Nigeria in 2100 astonishing. Nigeria’s population is currently around 230 million and is expected to be about 750-800 million by 2100. In that year, Nigeria’s population is expected to be about equal to China’s population and second only to India’s. The populations of the Congo and Tanzania are expected to triple. (For a detailed look at Nigeria, see Nigeria.)

     

    Africa and some poor countries outside of Africa will have the opposite problem of richer countries and regions. They will have above replacement birth rates for a generation or two. This will lead to high growth rates in labor force age groups and total population. Whether or not this will translate into high economic growth rates is problematic, depending on many other factors. These countries could be a source of large numbers of immigrants to richer countries.

    The long-term high birth rates and population growth rates partly explain why from 1970 to 2024 sub-Saharan Africa’s inflation-adjusted (real) GDP per person has not increased. Sub-Saharan population went from 290 million in 1970 to 1.3 billion in 2024, over 2% compounded yearly growth. Real income per person has remained around $1,500. Sub-Saharan’s economic future will partly depend on how fast the current birth rate declines.

     

    RUSSIA

     

    Russia’s population is declining. The UN projection is that Russia’s current population of around 145 million will fall to about 85 million by the end of the century, about a 40% decrease. The Lancet projection is around 105 million, about a 30% decline. Projected future birth rate of 1.43 is about the same as the current birth rate of 1.42.

     

    Russia has avoided a large decrease in its population by encouraging immigration, mostly from former republics of the Soviet Union. While birthrates are below replacement, the decline of the national population has been offset in recent years by immigration. The Lancet projection was made right after a period of large immigration, which has since slowed down. Lower rates of immigration since 2018 have contributed to decreases in population. 

     

    Male life expectancies in Russia have been going down for decades but might have recently stabilized (Russian statistics are suspect). Russia was particularly hard hit by Covid because of low levels of vaccination from an ineffective domestically produced vaccine. Russia has the world’s highest per capita consumption of alcohol and poor health care facilities outside of the major cities. The war in Ukraine has resulted in a large number of deaths and serious injuries. Also a large recent migration among educated young male adults, which might affect future population and economic growth projections. 

     

    CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE

     

    Because of past very low birth rates and high levels of out-migration, central and eastern Europe is looking at population declines in this generation. It is already happening in the Balkan countries. The war in Ukraine has led to millions of emigrants; how many will return is unknown. 

     

    Some UN projections show that many countries in central and eastern Europe might have even larger total percent declines than Japan by the end of the century (over 50%). The region as a whole will probably see a population decline of about 50% by 2100 to less than 100 million people (without Russia). This means that the “borderlands” of Europe, a traditional source of violence and target for conquest, will be depopulated. Total population of all of central and eastern Europe might be less than the population of Russia.

     

    WESTERN EUROPE

     

    Western Europe is further along the population aging curve but because of immigration of younger people, the decline will not be as precipitous. Countries in western Europe draw in immigrants from central and eastern European countries in the European Union and from former colonies. And western Europe, like Japan, currently starts with more resources to support an aging population.  But high structural unemployment rates, low economic growth, restrictive labor laws and generous early retirement benefits will strain western Europe’s ability to grow and maintain current social welfare levels. A few European countries realize that current levels of social welfare are not sustainable and have begun reviews of government retirement and health care programs. This problem is exacerbated by the currently very high unemployment and underemployment rates among younger employees.

     

    Facing the future, a number of Western European countries have set up programs to encourage legal migration from outside the European Union, in addition to migration from central European countries within the EU. But increase in immigrants is currently being met with increasing domestic opposition and the rise of anti-immigration political parties.

     

    CHINA

     

    Demographics Update (August 8, 2025)

    China’s slowly decreasing total population masks rapid and large changes in its age distribution. Between 2021 and 2024, the number of pre-school children (3 to 6 year olds) fell from 48 million to 36 million. The number is expected to fall another 14 million in the next five years as the birth rate of 1.0 is one of the lowest in the world. In contrast, over the same period, the number of people aged 65 and over is projected to  rise from 211 million to 256 million, according to UN projections.

    China, which enforced a “one-child” program from the 1970s to 2015, has one of the lowest birthrates in the world, around 1.1 (2023) and probably falling. Although the “one-child” program has been relaxed and then abandoned in recent years, the national birthrate is below that of the “one-child” period around 1.5 in the 1990s. The number of children is expected to fall about 50 million from around 2020 to 2035. 

    China currently has a relatively young average-age population but the average age is rising very rapidly because of the very low long-term birth rates. 

     

    China’s total population probably has already reached its peak of 1.4 billion people. The Lancet projection is a decline to about 750 million people in 2100. Thus China will account for most of the global decline of population.

     

    China’s working-age population began shrinking in 2012.  By around 2050, the decrease will be about the size of the current U.S. total labor force (170 million).

     

    China has a special problem that could affect future demographics. Chinese youth, ages 19-24, have a very high unemployment rate, probably over 20% and possibly much higher. The government stopped publishing statistics and then came out with a new series with a lower unemployment rate. Colleges graduates in particular are finding it hard to get a decent position; many are unemployed, accepting menial jobs just to earn small amounts of income, or are moving in with relatives. The government’s policy is to tell the unemployed youth to “eat bitterness.” 

    At a minimum, this will probably affect future demographics and economic growth – lower income, later marriages. This is in addition of a dearth of females because of the past “one child” policy that led to tens of millions of abortions of female embryos and female infanticide.

     

    As in the United States, a stagnant or declining population is not spread evenly across the country. Government policies to help rural and inland areas do not seem to be working. Between 2010 and 2020, 1,240 counties and county-cities out of 1,866 saw their populations shrink, many by up to 35%, as birth rates fell to record lows and people continued to go to cities in search of work.

    The Economist, “China’s last boomtowns show rapid growth is still possible,” July 30, 2024.

     

    Next year (2025) the median (half above, half below) age in China will pass that of the United States. China’s over-60 population of over 300 million is already close to the total population of the United States. By around 2050, the over-60 population is projected to be over 500 million, over 35% of China’s total population.

    China’s first reaction to this trend has been to slowly raise their low retirement ages over 15 years. For men, the retirement age is being raised from 60 to 63. For women, from 55 to 58 for white-collar workers and from 50 to 55 for blue-collar workers. A related reason is that the public pension costs are “squeezing” government budgets. (The Economist, “The World in Brief,” September 13, 2024).

     

    A mature, experienced workforce should help maintain high but falling economic growth rates for another generation. After about 2050, demographics will begin working against Chinese economic growth.

     

    This policy will be very unpopular. Traditionally, families were multi-generational and children (daughters and daughters-in-law) were expected to care for aging parents. But hundreds of millions of the working-age population have migrated from rural areas to cities, leaving their children in the care of grandparents. A rising percent of women in the cities are working. If retirement ages are raised and grandparents in both the cities and countryside have to work longer, there may be less baby-sitting. This might lower the birth rate even more. In addition, China has strong age discrimination, so that the older population might have to wait longer between being employed and receiving a retirement pension.

     

    China has massive internal migration. It is governed by hukou system, which has roots in Chinese history. 

     

    In the hukou system, everyone carries a household registration card with the individual’s place of birth. More than half of China’s population have a rural hukou. Individuals cannot legally change their hukou without official approval. But China’s need for large amounts of labor in cities and industrial areas has created a demand for “illegal” migrants. 

     

    The migrants have virtually no rights or legal protection. They have no access to social services, health care or education. Wages are often below the official minimum and they can be “deported” back to their home location at any time.

     

    This creates an exploited underclass similar to illegal immigrants in other countries. The number of rural migrant workers in China is maybe around 300 million, comprising more than one third of the Chinese labor force. Official Chinese 2020 census figures put the rural hukou population at 376 million people.

     

    Rural migrant laborers propelled the extraordinary boom of China’s economy over the last decades but are still subject to discrimination and unfair treatment. Their children are often separated from their parents for years and raised by grandparents. The government is slowly improving the legal status of some rural migrant workers but fears that former rural migrants might lead to higher unemployment in the major cities. 

    The minimum government-funded pension has been raised to about $22 a month. Migrant workers receive lower pension than those registered as city residences. They average about $28 a month. The government is slowly allowing some long-term hukou workers in cities to qualify for the higher pensions of city residents.

     

    Statista, “Migrant workers in China – statistics and facts,” June 3, 2024.

    The Economist, “Sunset Delayed,” September 21, 2024, 38-40.

     

    EAST AND SOUTHEAST ASIA – GROWING OLD BEFORE GETTING RICH

     

    Most countries in East Asia are “middle-income” countries, with per capita income of $7,000 or less. They are becoming “aged” societies (14% of population over 65) with 1/5 to 1/10 the per capita income that Japan had when it reached this level.

     

    South Korea has the lowest birth rate in the world of 0.7, followed by Taiwan with a birth rate of 0.87. Taiwan’s total population has already stopped growing.

     

    Because of low birth rates in the past, these countries are aging rapidly, more rapidly than rich countries like Japan, western Europe and the United States did in the past.

     

    South Korea and Taiwan are looking at demographic futures similar to Japan’s. South Korea’s current population of 51 million is expected to decline to 30 million or less by 2100. Taiwan’s population is expected to fall from 24 million currently to 11 million in 2100 despite a slight increase in the birth rate.

     

    Indonesia, the Philippines and Vietnam are expected to have different trajectories.  Indonesia, with a current population of 260 million and a birth rate close to replacement, might have about the same or slightly lower population in 2100. The Philippines has a high birth rate (3.2) and might see its population go from 105 million now to 170 million in 2100. Against this increase is the probability that the Philippines will continue to have high rates of emigration. Vietnam, with a current population of around 100 million, is expected to experience a decline to about 75 million in 2100.

     

    Looking at Asia as a whole, “Asia will account for 70% of the expected increase in senior citizens in poor countries by 2050.” (The Economist, “Old before their time,” October 14, 2023, 31)

     

    These countries, like China, are transitioning from having mature, experienced labor forces to retirement. A large mature labor force is good for economic growth. It is problematic how a country with a rapidly increasing percent of its population in the retirement ages will continue to experience economic growth.

     

    As in China, families have been a traditional source of care for the elderly. This is starting to break down as children migrate to the cities and more women have entered the labor force. Governments have been slow to provide support for their aging populations, although this is starting to change.

     

    SOUTH ASIA:  INDIA, BANGLADESH AND PAKISTAN

     

    India has a population of 1.4 billion people, about the same as China. The two countries together contain 35% of the world’s total population.

     

    Unlike China, India’s population is expanding. The Lancet projection is that India will reach a maximum population of around 1.6 billion in 2048 and then begin falling to 1.1 billion in 2100. Thus, by 2100, India and China will account for a decrease of about one billion people from today’s total.

     

    India’s birth rate is around 2.1, just at or above the replacement rate. Lancet’s projection is a continuous fall in India’s birth rate, reaching 1.3 in 2100. 

     

    India, like China, experiences massive internal migration. Based on a recent census, India has approximately 450 million internal migrants. They are mostly from the poorer north going to the richer south, replacing the south’s aging labor force.

     

    Bangladesh’s population is around 160 million people. Lancet expects its population to decrease to about 80 million by 2100, a 50% decline. Bangladesh’s current birth rate is just below replacement but is expected to fall to 1.2 in 2100.

     

    Pakistan is another populous country, with 215 million people. It also has a high birth rate, at 3.4. After reaching a peak population of about 315 million in 2062, Pakistan’s population is expected to fall to about 250 million in 2100, with a low birth rate of 1.3.

     

    LATIN AMERICA

     

    Latin America’s population of 582 million in 2100 is about the same as today. But without Mexico, Latin America’s population would decrease by 50 million.

     

    Lancet projections for the largest countries in Latin America:

     

    Latin America

       582

       575

    2.18

    1.58

    Most Populous Countries

    2017

    Population

    Projected 2100

    Population

    2017

    Birth Rate

    Projected 2100

    Birth Rate

     

    Brazil

    212

    165

    1.76

    1.44

     

    Mexico

    127

    145

    2.42

    1.44

     

    Columbia

      51

      47

    2.12

    1.45

     

    Argentina

      44

      48

    2.17

    1.62

     

         Total

    434

    405

     

     

     

     

     

    The following is mostly a summary of The Economist, “Continent of discontent,” September 7, 2019, 81.

     

    Gallup polls reveal that 31% of the population in Latin America want to leave their countries, about the same percent of the people polled in Africa and the Middle East. Latin Americans are fed up with violence and poverty, especially in southern Mexico, El Salvador, Honduras and Guatemala. Over 4 million people – about 13% of the population – have already left Venezuela. There have been recessions in Brazil and Argentina, in addition to 64,000 murders in Brazil in 2017. Drug gangs are a threat in many Latin American cities and countries. Much of the post-war increase in income and wealth has gone to a small percent of the population, a reason for the recent demonstrations in Chile. Overall, Latin America has had little economic growth since 2015.

     

    Corruption is everywhere. 80% of those polled in Latin America think their government is corrupt. According to another poll, “the share of Latin Americans dissatisfied with how democracy works in their country has risen from 52% in 2010 to 71% in 2018.” 

     

    Since 2018, autocratic populists who campaigned against corruption and crime won presidential elections in Brazil (a conservative), Mexico (a leftist) and other countries. Argentina has elected an outsider who promises major changes in a society racked by high rates of inflation.

     

    If voters remain disenchanted and disgusted, more autocratic leaders are likely to be elected. And emigration pressure on U.S. southern borders will increase.

     

    ——————————————————————————————–

     

    APPENDIX

     

    Lancet Methodology (Quoted from the authors of the Lancet study) 

     

    We modelled future population in reference and alternative scenarios as a function of fertility, migration, and mortality rates. We developed statistical models for completed cohort fertility at age 50 years (CCF50). Completed cohort fertility is much more stable over time than the period measure of the total fertility rate (TFR). We modelled CCF50 as a time-series random walk function of educational attainment and contraceptive met need. Age-specific fertility rates were modelled as a function of CCF50 and covariates. We modelled age-specific mortality to 2100 using underlying mortality, a risk factor scalar, and an autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model. Net migration was modelled as a function of the Socio-demographic Index, crude population growth rate, and deaths from war and natural disasters; and use of an ARIMA model. The model framework was used to develop a reference scenario and alternative scenarios based on the pace of change in educational attainment and contraceptive met need. We estimated the size of gross domestic product for each country and territory in the reference scenario. Forecast uncertainty intervals (UIs) incorporated uncertainty propagated from past data inputs, model estimation, and forecast data distributions.

    ======================================

    For two detailed studies, see

    Demographics, Immigration and Future Economic Growth of the United States


    Demographics and Population Projections of Japan

    Also see

    Nigeria

    China’s Economy, Politics, and Demography 

  • Demographics, Immigration and Future Economic Growth of the United States

    Demographics, Immigration and Future Economic Growth of the United States


     

    Americans


    SUMMARY

     

    Population projections and demographic changes, especially in the different age cohorts, should be seen along with large annual fiscal

    deficits and the large and increasing national debt. The connection is the forecasts of large increases in the over-65 age group and the shrinking working age (and tax-paying) age group. 

    This essay should be read along with Government Finance 101. Fiscal Policy:  Welcome to Alice in Wonderland. 


    UPDATE (November 2025)


    Combining the recent changes in the birth rate and net

    immigration, plus the “baked-in” projection that Americans over the age of 65 will increase by about 50 million by 2060 (see below), it seems likely that the number of Americans in the working ages  cohort (15-64) will decrease at least 40 million by 2060. From about 230 million in 2025 to 190 million in 2060. Well before then, it seems likely that America, like other wealthy countries, will have extensive temporary worker permit programs to augment the native-born work force. This will probably be combined with much more extensive use of generative AI algorithms to handle much of the information analysis in organizations combined with greatly increased use of industrial robots.


    UPDATE (October 2025)


    Projections are changing rapidly because of the dramatic change in net immigration and a slight but continuous fall in the birth rate. Past long run projections, assuming historic levels of immigration, now seem high.


    In January, the CBO’s projections  showed “without immigration the population would shrink beginning in 2033” if birth rates stayed at current low levels. Without immigration, the CBO now expects the US population to start shrinking in 2031. If there is net negative immigration – more deportations and immigrants leaving the US – CBO projections indicate that the population may reach zero growth as early as around 2028. 


    At least half of immigrants, about 6 million, have entered the country in the last four years with some protection from immediate deportation, especially under asylum status. This protection is being withdrawn, even from immigrants who have been granted asylum status in the past.


    There are some estimates that the total immigration population of the US is falling, about 1.5 million over the last year. This may indicate net negative immigration.


    Since immigrants tend to be young adults and have a higher birth rate than the US-born population, lower levels of immigration, mass deportations, and voluntary leaving of immigrants could lower the projected birth rates.


    UPDATE (September 2025)


    The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has updated its population projections based on a lower birth rate and lower net immigration. “The CBO projects that the U.S. population will increase from 350 million in 2025 to 367 million in 2055. Deaths will be greater than births starting around 2031; the gap gets larger over time. So all population growth after 2031 will be from net immigration. If net immigration falls to zero, the U.S. population will stop growing in 2031 and start a slow decrease after then.



    UPDATE (August 2025)


    Recent data from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention show the U.S. birth rate has fallen below 1.6, the lowest rate on record. With a falling birth rate, far fewer legal and illegal immigrants and increasing deportations, the United States is now on the same demographic falling population path as most other industrialized and industrializing countries. 


         Reported in The Economist, “America’s fertility crash reaches                                                                                               a new low,” August 5, 2025.

    OVERVIEW OF POPULATION PROJECTIONS AND DEMOGRAPHIC CHANGES 

    The longer-run projection is a population of about 335 million people in 2100 (Lancet), about the same number as today. This projection was made with data up to 2017. There is a very wide range of uncertainty around this projection, partly depending on future birth rates and levels of immigration.

     

    The U.S. birth rate is a little over 1.6, below the replacement level of 2.1. This is in line with some industrialized countries but higher than Japan, China, South Korea, and most European countries. If the birth rate stays about the same and there is little or no net immigration, the Lancet projection is too high. The U.S. maximum population may occur much sooner.


    According to the Census Bureau, by 2030, one in five Americans will be 65 or older, which is up from less than one in 10 in 1960.


    By 2060, the Population Reference Bureau expects the number of Americans 65 and older to more than double from 46 million today to over 98 million.


    In less than two decades, older adults are set to outnumber kids for the first time in US history.



    Because of demographics, the United States could have a relatively better economic future than almost any other industrial or industrializing country. Almost all these countries will experience declining populations (if levels of immigration do not substantially increase), many with population decreases of 30-50%. Also, most of these countries will have higher dependency ratios (a higher percent of old people) than the U.S. That is, the U.S. will have a relatively younger population. This is partly due to higher birth rates and high rates of immigration into the U.S. since the 1960s. With the current birth rate, the United States will reach maximum population later than the other industrial or developing countries.

     

    DEMOGRAPHICS OF AMERICA:  POPULATION PROJECTIONS

     

    For generations, demographers considered America exceptional. High levels of immigration and relatively high fertility rates increased its population faster, and kept it more youthful, then its rich country peers in Europe. Americans within their borders were also exceptionally mobile.

     

    America has had high population growth rates since the first immigrants. (For a detailed look at immigration in colonial times, see American Colonial History, 1607-1775) Since becoming a country, America’s population has gone from 4 million in 1790 (the first census) to 30 million in 1860 to the current (7/24) population of 343 million. The main reasons for America’s high population growth rates in the past have been high birth rates, immigration, relatively healthy and well-fed population, and industrialization (economic development and growth).

     

    The period from 1950 to 2000 was unusual. 

     

    Population during this period was:

     

     

    Year

    Population

    Millions

    Decade

    Increase

    Millions

    Decade

    % Increase

     

    1950

    152

     

     

     

    1960

    176

    24

    16%

     

    1970

    200

    24

    12

     

    1980

    223

    23

    12

     

    1990

    248

    25

    11

     

    2000

    282

    34

    14

     

    2010

    311

    29

    10

     

    2020

    339

    28

      9

     

     

    United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division,

    World Population Prospects, The 2024 Revisions

     

    Between 1950 and 2000, the U.S. population almost doubled. The American “baby boom” started after World War II, temporarily reversing the long-term decline in birth rates. In the middle of this period, partly due to more effective and more available birth control, starting around 1970, birth rates began a rapid decline. That was partly offset by an increase in immigration.

     

    Since 2000, population growth rates have slowed. The 2020-2030 population growth rates will probably be lower, maybe around 6% for the decade, because of Covid, lower birth rates, and lower net migration rates (fewer immigrants and more past migrants leaving the United States).

     

    The U.S. population at the beginning of 2024 was 343 million.

     

    The UN projection continues:

     

    2040 – 370 million

    2050 – 381 million

    2070s – 400 million

    2100 –  421 million


    The projected population in 2050 is only 11 million higher than 2040, a decade increase of only 3%. It is also 38 million people higher than 2024, an average increase of about 4-5% per decade.

    After the 2070, the U.S. population will increase by less than one million per year. (United Nations, World Population Prospects, 2024 Revision.) These projections are high and like past United Nations projections will probably be lower in the future.

     

     

    The alternative projection from Lancet expects the U.S. population to peak at 365 million in 2062 and then decline to 335 million in 2100, about the same number as today.

     

    There is a very wide range of uncertainty around this projection, depending on future birth rates and levels of immigration. These projections were made from a starting point of higher birth rates and higher immigration numbers before Covid and current immigration and deportation policies. Birth rates have not returned to pre-Covid levels.

     

    The U.S. birth rate has been around or slightly below replacement since 1975. The current (2024) U.S. birth rate at 1.62 is the lowest since records began in 1909. The population growth rate is 0.5% a year is low and falling. The 2025 population growth rate is expected to be around 0.2%.


    About half of the decline in the birth rate since 1990 has been due to fewer teenage pregnancies.

     

    Without past immigration and the children of immigrants, the U.S. population and labor force growth rate would have been lower in the past 40 years. And more of the total growth would have been in the over-65 age group. Immigrants tend to be young adults. If net immigration is zero or below, America’s birth rate will continue to fall.

     

    The over-65 population is expected to double in the next 35 years, from 46 million now to over 98 million in 2060. (Population Reference Bureau) All of the total population increase will be in the over-65 group; the number of people under 65 will decline. This will increase the ratio of the over-65 age group to the prime labor force age group of 18-64. Again, depending on immigration, since immigrants tend to be younger than the native population.

     

    Like other industrialized countries, older adults are expected to outnumber children (under 18) in less than two decades. (Population Reference Bureau) 

     

    The current birth rate is now about the same or slightly higher than that of many industrial countries. This might be partly due to the effects of Covid, although the current birth rate is the same as the birth rate during the Covid years of 2020-2022. But because of past immigration and its demographic effects, the long run decline in America’s population and the labor force should be less than most other industrialized countries.

     

    The partial abortion ban will have little effect on future population growth. The number of abortions was going down even before the ban. Abortions are still legal in many states. Abortion pills accounted for over half of abortions before the ban. In Europe, pills account for about 70% of abortions.

     

    The United States has a special problem. Because of the opioid/fentanyl epidemic and suicide, America’s adult mortality rate is increasing, mostly among white men under 55. A 15-year-old white male’s probability of dying before the age of 50 is now higher in America than in Bangladesh. The good news is that while still high, deaths from opioids and fentanyl are going down. The bad news is that a new, more powerful drug than fentanyl has begun to show up.

     

      

    ECONOMIC GROWTH AND THE FUTURE SIZE OF THE LABOR FORCE

     

    With birth rates below replacement, the future size of the labor force will depend critically on immigration. Future productivity increases will partly depend on immigrants’ young age composition, birth rate, and education and training.

     

    The current (2024/25) unemployment rate is near a post-World War II low. The labor crunch is likely to persist for some time. The Pew Research Center projects no or very little growth in the working-age population over the next two decades. If the United States were to cut off the flow of new immigrants, Pew noted, the American working-age population would shrink.

     

    The U.S. economy is growing at about 2-2½ percent a year. Employment is growing at about 1.0-1.5% a year; productivity is growing at about one percent a year. The size of the labor force (employed plus unemployed) is growing at about 0.3% per year; the growth rate is in long-term decline and may accelerate with a possible decrease of immigrant workers. This indicates that the growth in employment will probably be lower in the future than in the past.


    The US youth (16-24 years old) labor force participation rate is dropping. Bureau of Labor Statistics data show that only 53.1% of young people (ages 16-24) were employed during the summer of 2025, about 15 percentage points less than in 2000. This might also lead to delayed marriages and family formation. This could affect the demand for housing.


    This is puzzling. The minimum wage is much higher. College graduates have large amounts of student loan debt. Both of these should indicate higher labor force participation rates. But currently (second half of 2025), companies, based with uncertainty due to randomly changing tariffs, higher interest rates, and uncertainty about future consumption expenditures, are not hiring new entrants to the labor force.


    One possibility is that traditional employers of young people, such as restaurants, are cutting back on total employment and also substituting automation. 


    Periods of high youth dropping out and unemployment are historically correlated with increases in social instability, drug use, crime, and political extremism. 


        Ed D’Agostino, “Unemployment’s Slow Burn,” October 10, 2025.

    There’s another variable, one highlighted in The Wall Street Journal. Suzy Welch wrote an important commentary based on her research on Gen Z at NYU Stern School of Business. This group was born between 1997 and 2012, making them 13 to 28 years old today. Welch, former editor of the Harvard Business Review, took a look at Gen Z’s values. She found a stark disconnect between their values and those sought by today’s businesses.


    Welch reports that only about 2% of Gen Z prioritize the values most employers seek—achievement, learning, and a strong drive to work. Instead, Gen Z places higher value on selfcare, authenticity, and helping others—commendable values on their own, but when they are your top priorities, you might find it hard to thrive at work.

    Another possible source of disconnect of the young is the addictive attraction of the internet, especially video games, for males. Some researchers believe this is also the reason that male academic achievement is below female achievement and the gap is widening.


    Combined with the high use of illegal drugs, these factors might help explain the dropout rate and lack of traditional values.  

     

    Most of the recent increase in the size of the labor force has been in the over-55 age group. This is the fastest growing age group and more older Americans are living longer, healthier, and working past retirement age. Also, millions of Americans own small businesses and apparently do not automatically retire just because they turn 65. Others have technical skills (tax accountants, dentists, various types of data analysts) that allow them to continuing working, often part-time or online.


    There has been little increase in total employment in the under-55 age group. There are studies that suggest an aging labor force causes slower productivity growth. Also, possibly, less innovation. This may be a factor in the decline of new business formation.

     

    Like other wealthy countries, economic growth will depend on productivity increases. Productivity growth in the ten years of this economic expansion (since 2009, before Covid) was the lowest for any ten-year period since the end of World War II. It is possible, however, that government statistics are not picking up the productivity increases from innovations in information technology.

     

    DEMOGRAPHICS AND IMMIGRATION

     

    The following report from 2015 shows how important immigration has been from the 1960s to the date of the report. This is in contrast to the situation since Covid and the Trump campaign against immigration.


    According to a 2015 Pew Research Center report, “Immigrants and their children will represent 36 percent of the U.S. population in 2065, which equals or surpasses the peak levels last seen around the turn of the 20th century. That share will represent a doubling since 1965 (18 percent) and a notable rise from today’s 26 percent.” Pew estimates that as of March 2025, immigrants and their U.S.-born children comprise about 28% of the U.S. population, totaling over 93 million people. These projections are now in doubt because of the drastic reduction of immigrants seeking permanent residence.

     

    The report states that “the arrival of new immigrants and the births of their children and grandchildren accounted for 55 percent of the U.S. population increase since 1964…The projections also show that 88 percent of the increase in population until 2065 is linked to future immigrants and their descendants.”

     

    Over the last two decades, immigrants and their children accounted for more than half the growth of the population of 25- to 64-year-olds, according to the Pew analysis. Over the next 20 years, immigrants and their children will have to make up for the net deficit in the labor force left by the retirement of the baby boom generation. If immigration were to continue at recent levels, around 2050 the United States would have the lowest percent of retirement-age population of any developed country. Even lower than China. This means more tax-paying workers per retired person than any other industrialized country.

     

    Immigration over the last 50 years has impacted American demographics. The American population continues to grow despite below replacement birthrates of native-born inhabitants. Immigrants tend to be young, increasing the size of the workforce and slowing the increase of the average age of the population. The education and skills they bring is a “free lunch” for the American economy. A high percent of Americans who have won Nobel prizes were immigrants or the children of immigrants.

     

    Immigrants and their children have traditionally provided a disproportionate share of entrepreneurs. “Immigrants start companies at twice the rate of native Americans. Almost half the companies in the Fortune 500 were started by immigrants or their children.” (Austan Goolsbee, “Sharp Cuts in Immigration Threaten U.S. Economy,” New York Times Sunday Business, October 13, 2019, 4). One of the founders of Google was from Russia. The current CEOs of Microsoft and Google are from India and the CEOs of Nvidia and AMD are from Taiwan. 

     

    IMMIGRATION POLICY AND STATISTICS

     

    Currently, there are 9 million people in the United States with green cards, which means they are on a path to citizenship. During the Biden administration, about 3.5 million people became naturalized citizens, almost one million a year. (New York Times, “Immigrants are Becoming U.S. Citizens at Fastest Clip in Years,” August 12, 2024, From the photos in the article, it appears a high percent are young people.) 

     

    America has an estimated 11-14 million illegal immigrants. But this is more complicated than the political rhetoric and sensationalist journalism indicates. Many would have eventually attain some type of legal status leading to permanent residence; less now because of deportations and blocking the part to residence and citizenship.

     

    The United States does not have a coherent immigration policy. The last immigration law was passed in 1990. Attempts to modernize immigration policy has been stymied because of difference between Democrats and Republicans.

     

    The Trump administration reduced legal immigration and plans to make it difficult for foreign, especially Chinese, students to attend American colleges. In the past, foreign students who remained in the United States were a major source of scientists, technology workers and entrepreneurs. Over half of the science, math and engineering graduate students in the U.S. are from foreign countries.

     

    Discouraging immigration, limiting foreign work visas, and foreign graduate students will reduce major sources of American innovation, technology entrepreneurs, and productivity growth in the future. It will also eliminate the major source of the overall growth in the labor force. 

     

    DEMOGRAPHICS AND ECONOMIC GROWTH

     

    Immigration over the last 50 years has impacted American demographics. The American population continues to grow despite below replacement birth rates of native-born inhabitants. Immigrants tend to be young, increasing the size of the workforce. The education and skills they bring is a “free lunch” for the American economy. On the other hand, the increasing number of older Americans will make it difficult to reduce yearly deficits and fund programs for economic growth.


    The changing demographics of the United States may be influencing other variables besides economic growth. Changing demographics might interact in the future with changing social

    attitudes, global warming and how to combat it, and America’s foreign policy.

     

    POLITICAL CONSEQUENCES OF DEMOGRAPHIC TRENDS

     

    Immigration since 1960 has changed the ethnic and racial composition of America. Latinos make up about 20% of American population; Asians about 10%. There are about twice as many Latinos than blacks; there are almost as many Asians as blacks. This will change the influence of minority groups. (New York Times, February 22, 2021).

     

    The continuing change in the age distribution of the population will have political and economic consequences. For example, when the Social Security trust fund runs out around 2034 (maybe earlier), benefits will drop by at least 20%. With seniors on Social Security making up a large minority of voters, the government will probably make up the shortfall out of general tax revenue. This could increase federal yearly deficits or there would be less money for other programs.

     

    Fewer taxpayers in the future will have to support the greatly increased public health care costs of an aging population living longer.

     

    It could be that the United States will have a better economic future than almost any other country because of demographics. That partly depends on future immigration policies. And there probably will be internal political conflict over the distribution of income by age group.

    SUMMARY

     

    With labor force growth rates falling and productivity not increasing, the labor force aging, and legal immigration restricted, long-term U.S. economic growth rates may be lower in the future – below 2% – than currently. Increases in per capita income will depend on productivity increases from new technology, including the widespread application of robotics, new business software, artificial intelligence, and technology developed in the future. It is too early to predict what the long-run impact of artificial intelligence will be on economic growth and employment.


     

     

    SOURCES:


    S.E. Vollcet et. al., “Fertility, mortality, migration, and population scenarios for 195 countries and territories from 2017 to 2100: a forecasting analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study,” Lancet, July 14, 2020, 1285-1306. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0140-6736(20)30677-2.

     

    Probably the best estimates of long-run population projections. Also includes “uncertainty internals” (two standard deviations from mean estimate). They become wider the further out the projection.

     

    United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division,

    World Population Prospects, The 2024 Revisions

    The United Nations population projections used here are the most recent “medium,” most likely projections. They are lower than the UN projections made two years earlier. It is likely that future UN projections will revise population numbers downward.


    Pew Research Center

     

    Particularly strong on immigration data and analysis

     

    United States Census Bureau (census.gov)

    Statistica

    Population Reference Bureau

    Worldometer (for current figures)

    Numerous articles in The Economist


    Again, population projection and demographic changes should be thought of in connection with government deficits:


    Government Finance 101. Fiscal Policy:  Welcome to Alice in Wonderland.


    For population projections and analysis for Japan and the world, see

    Demographics and Population Projections of Japan


    In contrast to the United States and other countries, Japan is further along the declining population and labor force curve than almost any other country and may be a preview of the future of many countries outside of Africa. Japan has the world’s oldest population. There is limited but rising immigration, which has triggered a political backlash.


    For an analysis of global demographics and long-run population projections, see


    Global Demographics and Population Projections


    Demographics and Economic Growth


    For a look at current global and American use of industrial and humanoid robots, see


    Robots. “It’s Alive.”

    Includes some (hopefully) satirical comments about the future use of robots.